When taxes (almost) killed tap

By John Hood
Posted 12/4/19

RALEIGH — I write a syndicated column on politics and public policy that often centers on the issue of taxation. I am also a sometime practitioner and teacher of tap dancing. Combining my two …

Sign up to keep reading — It's FREE!

In an effort to improve our website and enhance our local coverage, MyDailyRecord.com has switched to a membership model. Fill out the form below to create a free account. Once you're logged in, you can continue using the site as normal. You should remain logged in on your computer or device as long as you don’t clear your browser history/cookies.

When taxes (almost) killed tap

Posted

RALEIGH — I write a syndicated column on politics and public policy that often centers on the issue of taxation. I am also a sometime practitioner and teacher of tap dancing. Combining my two interests was only a matter of time. That time is today.

During the golden age of tapping, in the 1930s and early 1940s, this quintessential American art form played a sizable role in pop culture. You could watch the likes of Fred Astaire, Eleanor Powell and the brother act of Fayard and Harold Nicholas at the movie house. Every city of at least modest size had thriving nightclubs that boasted swinging big bands and, frequently, tap virtuosos. Traveling acts still plied their trade throughout the extensive network of small-town theaters and venues once known as vaudeville. And because it was as much a form of percussive musical performance as of dancing, tap could even be heard on commercially produced records and radio’s top-rated variety shows.

The economics of tap dancing took a stumble during and just after World War II. For a fortunate few dancers such as Astaire and Gene Kelly, film would sustain their tap careers for years. But for most — and especially for black performers whom predominantly white audiences would not yet accept as cinematic leads — earning a decent living as a tap dancer became nearly impossible.

What brought an end to the golden age? As with most social phenomena, it was a complex event with many causes. The nightclub scene that plays such a huge role in sustaining the economics of big bands and live dancing would likely have undergone eventual decline anyway thanks to long-term shifts in urban development, technology and consumer tastes. But historians of swing music and tap dancing alike point to a proximate cause for the sharp decline of the mid-1940s: a federal excise tax.

Constantly on the lookout for revenue, a wartime Congress imposed a “cabaret tax” in 1944. Any venue that served food and drink and featured dancing had to pay a 30% excise tax. The highest-end clubs swallowed their objections, paid the excise and hiked their prices. But it was more than most of the market could bear. To remain viable businesses, thousands of nightclubs got rid of their floor shows and dance floors. Big bands shrank into jazz ensembles and trios.

“There were fewer and fewer places for a tap dancer to dance,” observed Brian Seibert, dance critic for the New York Times and author of the indispensable tap history “What the Eye Hears.”

Under public pressure, Congress later reduced the excise tax to 20%, then to 10% in 1960, and finally repealed it altogether in 1965 (if you are surprised that a “wartime” revenue measure long outlasted the war in question, you probably aren’t that familiar with the history of taxation.) By then, however, the economic damage had been done.

Fortunately, tap never died out entirely. New generations have fallen in love with the art form and renewed it, on Broadway and elsewhere. Tap found its legs, again — no thanks to the taxman.

John Hood (@JohnHoodNC) is chairman of the John Locke Foundation and appears on “NC SPIN,” broadcast statewide Fridays at 7:30 p.m. and Sundays at 12:30 p.m. on UNC-TV.

Comments

No comments on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment