To regulate is to tax

By John Hood
Posted 10/28/19

RALEIGH — If North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper proposed a $5 billion tax increase, his Republican rivals would be both furious and gleeful — furious about the potential economic consequences, that …

Sign up to keep reading — It's FREE!

In an effort to improve our website and enhance our local coverage, has switched to a membership model. Fill out the form below to create a free account. Once you're logged in, you can continue using the site as normal.

To regulate is to tax


RALEIGH — If North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper proposed a $5 billion tax increase, his Republican rivals would be both furious and gleeful — furious about the potential economic consequences, that is, and gleeful about the political ones.

Although the governor certainly thinks North Carolina’s tax rates ought to be higher, he couldn’t engineer a $5 billion hike even if he wanted to. But the Cooper administration has issued a single regulatory decision that, unless blocked in court, will raise the cost of cleaning up Duke Energy’s coal-ash ponds by approximately $10.6 billion, up from the original cost estimate of $5.6.

At issue is the disposition of six of Duke Energy’s coal-ash sites. While the company has already agreed to complete excavation at other locations, it contends that the best solution for sites rated “low risk” by state regulators would be to drain and then cap the ponds with a waterproof cover and layer of soil.

Digging up and transporting the ash from those sites would not improve public health enough to justify the exorbitant cost, Duke Energy concluded. The Cooper administration disagreed, both about the company’s conclusion and about whether the cost of compliance was an appropriate consideration in this case.

Given the Cooper administration’s other choices on energy policy, which seem to run the gamut from questionable to ludicrous, I think Duke Energy is probably right about the policy here. Perhaps you disagree. At least it should be clear that we are talking about a very large price tag even if you think the environmental benefits justify it.

Legally, the extra $5 billion isn’t a tax increase. In practical terms, however, it waddles and quacks like one.

Who will pay it? The burden will be shared. State regulators have already ruled, correctly in my view, that Duke shareholders won’t be required to foot the entire bill because the ash was a byproduct of coal-fired power plants that previously received regulatory approval. Indeed, Duke Energy customers are already paying $175 million a year approved by regulators to help cover the cost of coal-ash cleanup.

To say that regulations are a form of taxation — government exactions to pay for public services — is not to say they shouldn’t be imposed. A core function of government is to protect individual rights to life, liberty, and property. Protecting those rights inevitably requires legislation, litigation, or some combination thereof.

Regulation is, in other words, not all cost. But contrary to the apparent philosophy of the Cooper administration, it isn’t all benefit, either. When it comes to chemical exposure, for example, “the dose makes the poison,” as the old saying goes. If it costs billions of dollars to reduce trace amounts to somewhat tinier amounts, the policy actually harms the public interest rather than advancing it, because the economic costs — lost jobs, incomes, and opportunities — have their own adverse consequences on public health and safety.

Gov. Cooper’s coal-ash policy will cost hundreds of millions of dollars a year. If it were an on-budget state expenditure, it would attract significant scrutiny. As a regulation, it deserves just as much.

John Hood (@JohnHoodNC) is chairman of the John Locke Foundation and appears on “N.C. Spin,” broadcast statewide Fridays at 7:30 p.m. and Sundays at 12:30 p.m. on UNC-TV.


No comments on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment